Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
Dermatology is primarily an outpatient specialty, yet it is important to recognize certain conditions that require referral for inpatient management. Furthermore, healthcare professionals in the emergency room or urgent care settings need to appropriately triage patients who present with dermatological findings. This article will serve to summarize some of the diagnostic features and management of these patients.
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis
Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare but severe adverse cutaneous drug reactions characterized by erythema, hemorrhagic erosions, and separation of the epidermis, often with involvement of the mucous membranes (Harr & French, 2010; Mockenhaupt, 2014). SJS and TEN are best thought of as a single clinical entity that presents on two ends of a spectrum based on body surface area (BSA) involvement (Mockenhaupt, 2014).
Prodromal symptoms of SJS and TEN are vague, including fever, malaise, headache, cough, stinging eyes, and conjunctivitis, making early diagnosis challenging (Harr & French, 2010; Usatine, Smith, Mayeaux, Chumley, & Tysinger, 2009). One to three days later, cutaneous findings appear, beginning on the trunk, face, palms, and soles (Harr & French, 2010). In SJS, the primary lesions are dusky red or flat atypical target lesions, usually isolated, but lesions can become confluent on the face and trunk (Harr & French, 2010). Systemic symptoms are usually present, and epidermal detachment is found on <10% of BSA (Harr & French, 2010). In SJS–TEN overlap, the primary lesions and distribution are similar to those of SJS; however, systemic symptoms are always present, and epidermal detachment affects 10%–30% of BSA (Harr & French, 2010). In TEN, the primary lesions include poorly demarcated erythematous plaques, and there is considerable confluence of lesions all over the body (Harr & French, 2010). Systemic symptoms are always present, and the involved BSA is >30% (Harr & French, 2010). More than 90% of patients with TEN develop erosions of the buccal, genital, or oral mucosa, and the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts may be also affected (Harr & French, 2010; Revuz et al., 1987). Skin lesions can also include bullae and ulcerations, which can be extensive and affect most of the BSA (Hafermann, Barber, Dreskin, & Lindberg, 2014; Kaur & Dogra, 2013). Patients may experience ocular disease, ranging from mild conjunctival injection to corneal erosions and ulcerations (Chang et al., 2007). Additional manifestations include hypotension, renal failure, respiratory failure, seizures, and coma (Usatine & Sandy, 2010).
Diagnosis relies on clinical findings together with histological evidence of full-thickness epidermal necrolysis attributed to apoptosis of the keratinocytes (Harr & French, 2010). SJS/TEN should be in the differential for any patient showing characteristic skin lesions, and mucosal involvement should be with high suspicion for SJS/TEN and requires that a skin biopsy should be obtained (Harr & French, 2010). Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) should also be performed to rule out other autoimmune blistering diseases (Harr & French, 2010). Laboratory findings can include lymphopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, transaminases, and blood urea nitrogen (Usatine & Sandy, 2010). The Nikolsky sign, by which lateral pressure on erythematous skin causes blisters because of epidermal detachment, is often present but not specific for SJS or TEN (Harr & French, 2010).
Up to 75% of cases of SJS/TEN are instigated by drugs, with the most common offenders being lamotrigine, nevirapine, allopurinol, sulfonamides, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and oxicam-type nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as meloxicam (Harr & French, 2010;Mockenhaupt, 2014; Mockenhaupt et al., 2008). In one case-control study, the median time between beginning a high-risk drug and index day was less than 4 weeks (Mockenhaupt, 2014). Infections such as mycoplasma pneumonia, influenza-like illnesses, and herpes simplex virus have also been implicated in SJS/TEN (Harr & French, 2010; Mockenhaupt, 2014). Associations have also been reported with vaccinations, radiation, sunlight exposure, pregnancy, connective tissue diseases, and neoplasms (Usatine & Sandy, 2010).
In addition, it has been known since the 1980s that there is a genetic component to developing disease (Roujeau et al., 1987). Associations have been found between sulfonamide-induced TEN with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A29, B12, and DR7 and oxicam-induced TEN with HLA-A2 and B12 (Roujeau et al., 1987). Recent studies in the Han Chinese population suggest an association between carbamazepine-induced SJS and HLA-B*1502 (Chung et al., 2004).
Because the exact cause of SJS/TEN is unknown, treatment consists of cessation of likely causative agents, supportive care, and alleviating symptoms (Harr & French, 2012). Even after discontinuation of certain drugs, damage to the kidneys or liver, in addition to the long half-lives and reactive metabolites of certain drugs, can contribute to further morbidity (Harr & French, 2012). Most patients will require intensive care unit monitoring, with particular attention to fluids and electrolytes, nutritional requirements, wound care, and monitoring for infections. Blisters should not be debrided because their presence enhances reepithelialization (Harr & French, 2010). Erosions can be treated with chlorhexidine, octenisept, or polyhexanide and covered with nonadherent gauze; topical sulfa medications should not be used (Harr & French, 2010; Mockenhaupt, 2014). Ophthalmologic consult is necessary to prevent permanent ocular sequelae (Mockenhaupt, 2014).
Average mortality rates are 1%–5% in SJS and 25%–35% in TEN, with higher rates of death in elderly patients and those with extensive BSA involvement (Harr & French, 2010). The mortality rate of patients with TEN can be estimated using SCORTEN, a severity-of-illness score that takes into account seven independent risk factors for death: age, an underlying malignancy, tachycardia, BSA involvement, and serum urea, glucose, and bicarbonate values (Bastuji-Garin et al., 2000).
Although the skin usually heals, more than half of survivors of TEN are left with residual complications including changes to the skin, hair, nails, mucous membranes, eyes, and respiratory epithelium (Harr & French, 2010, 2012; Mockenhaupt, 2014). Skin changes include hypopigmentation or hyperpigmentation, pruritus, xerosis, and hyperhidrosis (Mockenhaupt, 2014). Hair and nail changes include reversible hair loss, onycholysis, and onychodystrophy (Mockenhaupt, 2014). In one study, 73% of patients with TEN with mucosal involvement had permanent mucosal sequelae (Oplatek et al., 2006). These mucosal changes most often affect the oral and esophageal mucosa (loss of papilla on the tongue, impaired taste, strictures of the esophagus) but can also affect the genital mucosa (adhesions in the urethra, anus, and vagina; Mockenhaupt, 2014; Oplatek et al., 2006). Ocular complications include severe dry eyes, trichiasis, symblepharon, distichiasis, ocular scarring, and blindness (Usatine & Sandy, 2010; Yip et al., 2007). The most common cause of death from TEN is septicemia, often because of central venous lines (Mockenhaupt, 2014). One of the most serious complications of TEN is damage to the tracheal and bronchial epithelium, which occurs in up to 20% of patients (Mockenhaupt, 2014).
Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis
Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rapidly progressive necrosis of skin, muscle, and soft tissue that spreads along fascia planes at a rate of 2–3 cm per hour (Misiakos et al., 2014). The areas most often affected are the lower extremities, abdomen, and perineum, with the latter referred to as Fournier gangrene (Usatine & Sandy, 2010).
NF is often diagnosed clinically, although definitive diagnosis is surgical, showing “dishwater fluid” compromised of necrotic tissue and neutrophils (Misiakos et al., 2014). Suspected cases require gram staining of the drainage as well as histological examination and culture of deep tissue biopsies (Usatine & Sandy, 2010). Laboratory findings, although not specific, include white blood cell (WBC) count > 14,000 cells per mm3, serum sodium < 135 mEq/L, and blood urea nitrogen >15 mg/dl (Usatine & Sandy, 2010). X-rays can show evidence of gas in the soft tissue, but computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging can show with better detail the extent of infection, swelling, inflammation, and presence of gas (Misiakos et al., 2014; Morgan, 2010).
Wong, Khin, Heng, Tan, and Low (2004) created a scoring system known as LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) to distinguish between necrotizing and nonnecrotizing soft tissue infections based on laboratory values (Wong et al., 2004). They identified six variables associated with necrotizing infections: C-reactive protein, WBC count, hemoglobin, serum sodium, creatinine, and serum glucose levels. Using this scoring system, intermediate- and high-risk patients (scoring >6/13) had a positive predictive value of 92% and negative predictive value of 96%.
Although many cases of NF are idiopathic, patients should be asked about a history of trauma including insect bites, recent surgery, skin infection, and illicit intravenous drug use (Morgan, 2010).
Type I NF accounts for 70%–80% of cases and tends to affect patients with recent trauma or surgery, those who are immunocompromised, and patients with underlying abdominal disease (Morgan, 2010; Usatine & Sandy, 2010). It is a polymicrobial infection with the most common offenders being non-group-A Streptococci, Bacteroides, Enterobacteriaceae, and Peptostreptococcus(Usatine et al., 2009). Type II NF, responsible for 20%–30% of cases, is because of infection by group A β-hemolytic strep (Streptococcus pyogenes) and less commonly by Staphylocccus (S.) aureus (Misiakos et al., 2014; Morgan, 2010). In Asia, NF can be associated with certain types of raw or undercooked seafood containing Vibrio spp., Aeromonas spp., and Shewanella spp. (Park et al., 2009). The rate of progression depends on the microorganisms: Type 2 NF spreads at a much faster rate than Type 1 NF (Morgan, 2010). The resulting tissue necrosis is because of damage from bacterial enzymes but also thrombosis of blood vessels in the hypodermis (Park et al., 2009).
Early detection is imperative so that patients can undergo surgical debridement and receive broad-spectrum antibiotics, with the former being the most crucial component of treatment (Misiakos et al., 2014).
Early and aggressive surgical interventions are crucial; in one study, surgical delay of 24 hours increased the mortality rate of Vibrio spp.-induced NF from 35% to 53% (Klontz et al., 1988). Even a 12-hour delay in surgery can be fatal in patients with fulminant disease (Misiakos et al., 2014). Surgical management requires debridement, necrosectomy, and fasciotomy (Misiakos et al., 2014). After surgery, fluid losses, nutritional needs, and wound healing must be carefully monitored. The use of vacuum-assisted closure dressings aids in wound cleaning and enhances the formation of granulation tissue (Misiakos et al., 2014).
Empiric antibiotics must cover gram positives (e.g., vancomycin, linezolid, ampicillin plus gentamycin), gram negatives (e.g., quinolones), and anaerobes (e.g., clindamycin or metronidazole; Usatine & Sandy, 2010). An in vitro study found that clindamycin, either alone or with a penicillin, decreased early release of streptococcal exotoxin A compared with using a penicillin alone (Coyle, Cha, & Rybak, 2003).
For Type 1 NF, ampicillin or ampicillin–sulbactam in combination with metronidazole or clindamycin can be used (Misiakos et al., 2014). For Type 2 NF, antibiotics must cover S. pyogenesand S. aureus, which often coexist, and can include first- or second-generation cephalosporines (for methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]), vancomycin, daptomycin, or linezolid (Misiakos et al., 2014). Antibiotics can be tailored based on blood, wound, and tissue cultures but must be continued for at least 48 hours after patients are clinically and hemodynamically stabilized (Misiakos et al., 2014). Patients often require antibiotics for 4–6 weeks (Misiakos et al., 2014). There may be a role for adjunct hyperbaric oxygen and IVIG (especially for streptococcal toxic shock syndrome [TSS]), but further studies with these agents are required (Kaul et al., 1999; Krenk, Nielsen, & Christensen, 2007). Hyperbaric oxygen appears to reduce mortality and amputation rates for Clostridium spp.-associated NF by reducing α-toxin production and enhancing neutrophil activity (Escobar, Slade, Hunt, & Cianci, 2005; Morgan, 2010).
Risk factors associated with a poor prognosis are diabetes mellitus (the most common associated morbidity), chronic renal failure, liver cirrhosis, chronic alcohol abuse, and immunosuppression (Misiakos et al., 2014). Some patients require amputation of limbs if there is extensive necrosis or they are not able to tolerate the lengthy operation needed to save the limb (Misiakos et al., 2014; Tang, Ho, Fung, Yuen, & Leong, 2001). Although amputations do not reduce mortality, patients have fewer repeat operations (Wong et al., 2003). The median mortality rate for NF is 32.3%, which increases to 70% in patients with sepsis and to almost 100% without treatment (Misiakos et al., 2014; Usatine & Sandy, 2010).
Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever
Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis
The classic triad of Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) is fever, rash, and severe headache, although myalgias (especially involving the abdominal, back, and calf muscles), nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain (especially in children, which can be mistaken for appendicitis), conjunctival injection, and altered mental status can also be present (Cunha, 2008; Salinas, Greenfield, Little, & Voskuhl, 2010; Usatine & Sandy, 2010). Less commonly seen are manifestations such as periorbital edema, edema of the dorsum of the hands and feet, and hepatosplenomegaly (Cunha, 2008).
The diagnosis is based on clinical presentation with a history favoring exposure to a tick (Salinas et al., 2010). It is helpful to ask patients about exposure to environments where ticks are found because the tick bite itself is painless and often goes unnoticed. Laboratory findings may show thrombocytopenia, hyponatremia, and elevated transaminases with a normal WBC count (Usatine & Sandy, 2010). Chest imaging can reveal interstitial pneumonitis or infiltrates because of myocarditis (Cunha, 2008; Salinas et al., 2010). Serum titers of anti-Rickettsia (R.) rickettsi antibodies with greater than a fourfold increase are confirmatory, but this may take up to 10 days after the onset of disease (Salinas et al., 2010; Wolff & Fitzpatrick, 2005). Punch biopsy with DIF may reveal rickettsial organisms in the endothelium of blood vessels (Salinas et al., 2010; Usatine & Sandy, 2010). Although polymerase chain reaction of skin biopsies alone is not sensitive, this method is often combined with immunohistochemical staining (Chapman et al., 2006).
RMSF is caused by the gram-negative intracellular bacterium R. rickettsi. Although several ticks can transmit this disease, the two most common are the wood tick (Dermacentor andersoni) in the western United States and the brown dog tick (Dermacentor variabilis) in the eastern United States (Chapman et al., 2006; Usatine & Sandy, 2010). After the tick bites, the bacterium travels through the lymphatic system and multiplies in endothelial cells causing vascular inflammation that presents as a vasculitis (Salinas et al., 2010). Although any organ can be involved, the skin and adrenals glands are most commonly affected (Usatine & Sandy, 2010).
Doxycycline 100 mg twice daily (orally or intravenously), or 2.2 mg/kg for children < 100 lbs, is the first-line treatment, with tetracycline being an alternative agent (Chapman et al., 2006). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends antibiotics for 3 days after the fever disappears and until the patient shows clinical improvement, which is usually 5–7 days (Chapman et al., 2006). In pregnancy, chloramphenicol is recommended (Yu, Merigan, & Barriere, 1999).
With a case fatality rate of 5%–10%, RMSF is the most commonly fatal rickettsial disease in the United States (Chapman et al., 2006; Salinas et al., 2010; Usatine & Sandy, 2010). The severity varies greatly with some patients being stable enough to be treated on an outpatient basis and others requiring hospitalization (Usatine & Sandy, 2010). Factors associated with more severe disease include older age, male, black race, chronic alcoholism, and glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase deficiency (Walker & Raoult, 2005). Aside from severe cases, persistent fever after 48 hours of antibiotics should raise concerns regarding the diagnosis (Salinas et al., 2010). Complications of RMSF include gangrene of the digits sometimes requiring amputation, myocarditis, meningoencephalitis, meningitis, sepsis, cardiac and renal failure, hearing loss, blindness, and other neurological deficits (Archibald & Sexton, 1995; Salinas et al., 2010; Usatine & Sandy, 2010). It is imperative for healthcare professionals to report cases of RMSF to the state health department (Usatine & Sandy, 2010).
Although commonly associated with tampon use, TSS has also been reported with barrier contraceptives, intrauterine devices, respiratory infections, nasal packs, and various soft tissue infections including surgical wounds, infected burns, postpartum infections, and deep abscesses (Ferguson & Todd, 1990; Schwartz et al., 1989). Public education regarding the risk of TSS from tampon use has led to a decrease in menstrual-associated TSS, whereas the frequency of nonmenstrual TSS cases has remained relatively constant (Reiss, 2000). Menstrual and nonmenstrual cases, which appear the same clinically, now occur with almost the same frequency (Andrews et al., 2001; Reingold, Hargrett, Dan, et al., 1982). The former is classically seen in White women of childbearing age, whereas the latter is seen equally in men and women (Reiss, 2000).
A thorough physical examination is necessary to look for and remove foreign bodies that might be instigating the infection, to debride infected wounds, or to drain abscesses (Reiss, 2000). The main priority for patients with TSS is supportive care similar to that for septic shock, which usually warrants admission to the intensive care unit (Silversides et al., 2010). Most patients require massive fluid resuscitation and vasopressors because of resistant hypotension and sometimes intubation and ventilation (Reiss, 2000; Silversides et al., 2010). Other supportive measures include hydrocortisone, glycemic control, blood products, and parenteral nutrition (Silversides et al., 2010). The third component of treatment is antibiotic therapy, which ideally should be started after blood cultures are taken (Silversides et al., 2010). For staphylococcal TSS, nafcillin, cloxacillin, or flucloxacillin are used alone or with an aminoglycoside, whereas vancomycin is reserved for MRSA strains (Silversides et al., 2010). For streptococcal TSS, clindamycin is used together with penicillin (Madhusudhan et al., 2007).
Interestingly, antibiotics are not used to shorten the duration of disease but rather to reduce the risk of recurrence; up to one third of patients with menstrual TSS who are not treated with antibiotics will experience recurrent disease (Davis, Chesney, Wand, & LaVenture, 1980; Davis et al., 1982). Those at risk are likely colonized with a virulent strain of S. aureus and lack the neutralizing antibody that normally protects adults from the toxin (Andrews et al., 2001). Patients treated with antistaphylococcal antibiotics appear to decrease their risk of recurrent disease (Andrews et al., 2001; Davis et al., 1980, 1982). Recurrent nonmenstrual TSS is far less common, although cases have been reported (Andrews et al., 2001). Further evaluation is required to determine the appropriate duration of therapy to eliminate toxigenic carriage, but previous studies suggest that a 2-week course is sufficient (Andrews et al., 2001). IVIG might play a role for patients with severe streptococcal disease, but there are insufficient data to recommend a particular dosing regimen (Darenberg et al., 2003; Schlievert, 2001; Silversides et al., 2010).
Complications of TSS include coagulation abnormalities such as disseminated intravascular coagulation, sepsis, acute tubular necrosis, acute kidney injury, ARDS, hepatic dysfunction, splitting of the nails, reversible hair and nail loss, cardiac dysfunction, and central nervous system complications (Reiss, 2000; Silversides et al., 2010).
Most children experiencing physical abuse have cutaneous findings. We will briefly review dermatological findings of the more commonly seen abuse patterns and mention several cultural practices that are often mistaken for signs of child abuse.
Bruises are a very common finding in children, especially over the knees, anterior tibia, and bony prominences (Carpenter, 1999; Chadwick, 1992). Bruises of varying ages in uncommon areas, such as the upper arms, medial and posterior thigh, hands, trunk, cheeks, ears, neck, genitalia, and buttocks, should raise suspicion (Ermertcan & Ertan, 2010). Bruises in infants who are not yet mobile, especially under 9 months old, are a red flag (Labbé & Caouette, 2001). The shape of the bruise can sometimes give an indication to the type of object used to harm the child (Ermertcan & Ertan, 2010; Kos & Shwayder, 2006).
Ecchymoses, abrasions, or lesions in an oval or elliptical pattern should raise suspicion for a bite mark, with human bite marks typically more superficial than animal bites (Ermertcan & Ertan, 2010). All bite marks should prompt a full skin examination for other signs of abuse; they can pose a concern regarding infection (Kos & Shwayder, 2006). The shape, color, and diameter must be recorded; photographs should be taken; and the bite should be swabbed with a sterile cotton swab and sent to a forensic laboratory (Ermertcan & Ertan, 2010; Kini & Lazoritz, 1998).
The oral cavity is frequently injured in child abuse victims so a thorough examination is necessary. Injuries can include contusions, burns, and lacerations of the tongue, lips, buccal mucosa, palate, and gums. Children can experience fractured or displaced teeth, facial bone and jaw fractures, and tears of the frenulum or labia (Ermertcan & Ertan, 2010). A torn frenulum is almost always pathognomonic of abuse (Kos & Shwayder, 2006). Erythema or petechiae of the palate, especially the junction of the soft and hard palate, is sometimes suggestive of oral sexual abuse (Ermertcan & Ertan, 2010).
Several other findings are also concerning for child abuse. Traumatic alopecia may be accompanied by petechiae at the pulled hair root or a boggy scalp because of subgaleal hemorrhage (Ermertcan & Ertan, 2010; Kos & Shwayder, 2006). The differential diagnosis includes tinea capitis, traction alopecia, trichotillomania, loose anagen syndrome, and alopecia areata (Ermertcan & Ertan, 2010). Findings of sexual abuse include abrasions and lacerations of the genitalia and bite marks on the inner thighs of genitalia (Ermertcan & Ertan, 2010). Finally, children can present with signs of neglect such as severe dermatitis, subcutaneous wasting, and scaly skin because of malnutrition and poor hygiene (Ermertcan & Ertan, 2010).
There are several cultural practices that are important for us to be aware of because their manifestations can mimic those of child abuse (Ermertcan & Ertan, 2010). Cao gio, also known as coin rubbing or coining, is a well-known practice in Southeast Asia whereby a coin is rubbed repeatedly over pre-oiled or lubricated skin to treat many different illnesses (Yeatman & Dang, 1980). It can result in linear erythematous marks, petechiae, purpura, and burns, most often on the back, neck, head, shoulders, and chest (Davis, 2000; Ermertcan & Ertan, 2010; Yeatman & Dang, 1980). A practice known as cupping creates areas of lower air pressure and suction next to the skin, resulting in circular ecchymoses, hyperpigmentation, hematomas, and lacerations (Ravanfar & Dinulos, 2010). Oils are often placed on the skin, to which children can develop a contact dermatitis with erythema, blisters, and scaling (Ravanfar & Dinulos, 2010). Moxibustion, a component of traditional Chinese medicine, burns herbs that are placed on the skin via acupuncture needles, either directly or via a moxa stick, sometimes resulting in burns and scars (Ravanfar & Dinulos, 2010). Salting is a practice in Turkey whereby neonates are scrubbed with salt for an hour, which can lead to epidermolysis, severe hypernatremia, and scalded skin (Ravanfar & Dinulos, 2010). Gridding, originating from Russian culture, consists of painting a grid-like pattern on the back of a child with iodine to help with respiratory illnesses (Ravanfar & Dinulos, 2010).
The Erythrodermic Patient: Management Approach
Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis
Erythroderma, also known as exfoliative dermatitis, is a dermatological emergency most commonly seen in patients 41–61 years old, with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1–4:1 (Bruno & Grewal, 2009; Rothe, Bernstein, & Grant-Kels, 2005). It is characterized by diffuse erythema and scaling of the skin, often affecting more than 90% of BSA, but sometimes sparing the nose and paranasal areas (Okoduwa et al., 2009). Cutaneous findings often begin as erythematous patches that grow in size, coalesce, and spread over the body (Okoduwa et al., 2009). White and yellow scales develop, and the skin eventually appears bright red, dry, scaly, and warm upon touch (Okoduwa et al., 2009). Chronic erythroderma is often characterized by lichenfication, diffuse alopecia, nail dystrophy, keratoderma, and ectropion (Rothe et al., 2005). Nail changes include thick, dry, and brittle nails; nail shedding; subungual hyperkeratosis; distal onycholysis; and ridging of the nail plate (Okoduwa et al., 2009). Patients can also report fever, malaise, fatigue, pruritus, gynecomastia, and peripheral or periorbital edema (Okoduwa et al., 2009; Rothe et al., 2005).
The most common causes are psoriasis, spongiotic dermatitis, drug eruptions, and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (Rothe et al., 2005). However, etiologies include exacerbation of underlying dermatoses (psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, seborrheic dermatitis, pityriasis rubra pilaris), infections, systemic diseases, hematologic diseases (cutaneous T-cell lymphoma), and solid tumor malignancies (Rothe et al., 2005). In many cases, no underlying cause can be found, and the condition is labeled as idiopathic. In one study analyzing 64 cases of erythroderma, the two most common causes were underlying dermatoses (58%) and drugs (16%), with 16% of cases labeled as idiopathic (Eugster, Kissling, & Brand, 2001). The most common drug triggers include antiepileptics, antibiotics, antihypertensives, calcium channel blockers, cimetidine, lithium, and other topical agents (Akhyani, Ghodsi, Toosi, & Dabbaghian, 2005; Okoduwa et al., 2009). As the etiologies are numerous, here, we will focus on a general approach for the management of erythrodermic patients, which is common to all etiologies.
The first step in the management of erythroderma is obtaining a detailed history, paying particular attention to all systemic and topical medications. Vital signs must be taken to ensure that patients are stable and do not require immediate admission to hospital (Rothe et al., 2005). Next, patients need a thorough skin examination, with special focus on the nails, mucous membranes, and lymph nodes and the presence or absence of hepatosplenomegaly (Rothe et al., 2005). Certain physical findings can suggest the underlying etiology, for example, psoriatic erythroderma (psoriasiform plaques), pityriasis rubra pilaris (islands of spared skin, orange palmoplantar keratoderma, hyperkeratotic follicular plaques on extensor surfaces), lichen planus (violaceous papules and buccal mucosal lesions), erythrodermic dermatomyositis (Gottron’s papules, heliotrope rash, periungual telangiectasias, poikiloderma), immunobullous diseases (blisters and erosions), Sézary syndrome (severe pruritus, lagophthalmos, alopecia, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, fissured keratoderma, onychodystrophy, and leonine facies from skin infiltration), and scabies (burrows, especially along the flexural wrist surfaces; Okoduwa et al., 2009; Rothe et al., 2005; Yamashita, Abbade, Marques, & Marques, 2012).
Laboratory changes, although often not specific, include leukocytosis with eosinophilia, anemia, decreased albumin, elevated uric acid, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and immunoglobulin E (Okoduwa et al., 2009; Rothe et al., 2005; Yamashita et al., 2012). Sézary cell count > 20% of circulating lymphocytes and a CD4–CD8 ratio > 10 are suspicious for Sézary syndrome (Yamashita et al., 2012). Biopsies are often nonspecific, illustrating hyperkeratosis, parakeratosis, acanthosis, and perivascular inflammatory infiltrates (Okoduwa et al., 2009). Retrospective studies show that the correlation between pathological diagnosis and clinical diagnosis ranges from 48% to 66%; multiple punch biopsies are usually required to establish a diagnosis (Rothe et al., 2005; Walsh et al., 1994; Zip, Murray, & Walsh, 1993). The use of special stains, gene rearrangement tests (to rule out lymphoproliferative disease), and DIF (helpful for ruling out autoimmune blistering diseases) can also facilitate diagnosis (Rothe et al., 2005). Patch testing can help rule out allergic contact dermatitis, and biopsies of abnormal lymph nodes may reveal underlying malignancies (Rothe et al., 2005). If no etiology is found, a systemic disease should be considered, and the patient should be surveilled appropriately (Rothe et al., 2005).
Patients should stop taking all unnecessary medications, especially those that are known to be possible triggers. They often require supportive care with focus on fluid and electrolyte requirements, nutrition, and wound care (Rothe et al., 2005). Protein loss from scaling of the skin requires an increase in daily protein by 25%–30% in psoriatic erythroderma and 10%–15% for other causes; deficits cause edema, muscle wasting, and hypoalbuminemia (Kanthraj et al., 1999). For weeping or crusted lesions, emollients and low-potency topical corticosteroids can be applied, covered by wet dressings or the use of oatmeal baths (Rothe et al., 2005). Caution is advised with topical immunomodulators such as tacrolimus as one patient with generalized leukemic erythroderma developed elevated blood levels of tacrolimus, posing a risk for nephrotoxicity (Teshima et al., 2003). Other supportive measures include the use of air humidifiers to help moisturize the skin and prevent hypothermia and oral antihistamines to relieve pruritus (Chang et al., 2007; Rothe et al., 2005). Systemic treatment options include corticosteroids, methotrexate, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and acitretin (Rothe et al., 2005). Patients with signs of secondary infection require systemic antibiotics, and those with edema may benefit from a diuretic (Rothe et al., 2005).
Patients are at high risk for thermoregulatory dysfunction, fluid and electrolyte imbalances, high-output cardiac failure, ARDS, secondary infection, and sepsis (Rothe et al., 2005). The most common causes of death are pneumonia, septicemia, and heart failure (Okoduwa et al., 2009). Although drug-induced erythroderma will resolve after cessation of the offending drug, the prognosis for other cases of generalized erythema depends on the underlying cause.
Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome
Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe drug reaction that typically occurs 2–8 weeks after exposure to the causative agent and can present with a variety of features (Choudhary, McLeod, Torchia, & Romanelli, 2013). Certain patterns are more commonly associated with specific drugs. However, most patients have fever, cutaneous manifestations, and systemic findings such as lymphadenopathy, leukocytosis with eosinophilia, and abnormal liver function tests (Choudhary et al., 2013).
In one study analyzing retrospective data from 216 patients with cutaneous drug reactions and systemic symptoms, 73%–100% had cutaneous findings, with the most common patterns being a diffuse maculopapular rash and erythroderma (Peyrière et al., 2006). However, lichenoid dermatitis, urticaria, vesicles, bullae, pustules, purpura, erythema multiforme lesions, facial edema, and cheilitis can also be present (Chiou et al., 2008; Choudhary et al., 2013; Peyrière et al., 2006). Other systemic symptoms include hematological abnormalities such as anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia; gastrointestinal symptoms; renal dysfunction (especially when associated with allopurinol); lung involvement (most commonly associated with minocycline); and heart abnormalities (also commonly associated with minocycline; Peyrière et al., 2006).
Common drug triggers include antiepileptics (the predominant cause of DRESS), allopurinol, sulfonamides, and antibiotic metabolites (Chiou et al., 2008; Choudhary et al., 2013; Eshki et al., 2009). Although the exact etiology is unknown, DRESS is most likely multifactorial. There is a genetic component characterized by a deficit in enzymes that break down drug metabolites (Choudhary et al., 2013). In addition, there are probably associations with certain HLA subtypes, such as has been described with HLA-B*1052 and carbamazepine-induced SJS (Chung et al., 2004). Finally, certain drugs might trigger reactivation of a virus, such as has been observed for the Epstein–Barr virus (Kano & Shiohara, 2004).
Visceral involvement can lead to pneumonitis, hepatitis, renal failure, colitis, encephalitis, myocarditis, pericarditis, cardiac failure, and pancytopenia, causing multiorgan failure (Choudhary et al., 2013; Eshki et al., 2009). Although most patients recover after cessation of the causative agent, the mortality rate is often reported at 10% (Chiou et al., 2008; Eshki et al., 2009).
Although dermatology may have fewer emergencies compared with other specialties, the mortality rates of those diseases can be profound. In addition, it can be challenging to pinpoint the diagnosis. Many of the diagnoses are made on clinical grounds without the benefit of standardized diagnostic criteria. Several of the conditions described above can present with a variety of different symptoms. Furthermore, the clinical presentations can change based on disease progress. Finally, patients can have comorbid conditions that exacerbate or mask their clinical presentation.
Although there are many other examples of diseases of the skin that require immediate attention, we have attempted to describe some of the more common states for practitioners to be aware of. As with most conditions, early intervention and diagnostic acumen are important for long-term success in managing these patients.
Akhyani, M., Ghodsi, Z. S., Toosi, S., & Dabbaghian, H. (2005). Erythroderma: A clinical study of 97 cases. BMC Dermatology, 5, 5.
Andrews, M. M., Parent, E. M., Barry, M., & Parsonnet, J. (2001). Recurrent nonmenstrual toxic shock syndrome: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 32(10), 1470Y1479.
Archibald, L. K., & Sexton, D. J. (1995). Long-term sequelae of Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 20(5), 1122Y1125.
Bastuji-Garin, S., Fouchard, N., Bertocchi, M., Roujeau, J. C., Revuz, J., & Wolkenstein, P. (2000). SCORTEN: A severity-of-illness score for toxic epidermal necrolysis. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 115(2), 149Y153.
Bruno, T. F., & Grewal, P. (2009). Erythroderma: A dermatologic emergency. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 11(3), 244Y246.
Carpenter, R. F. (1999). The prevalence and distribution of bruising in babies. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 80(4), 363Y366.
Chadwick, D. L. (1992). The diagnosis of inflicted injury in infants and young children. Pediatric Annals, 21(8), 477Y483.
Chang, Y. S., Huang, F. C., Tseng, S. H., Hsu, C. K., Ho, C. L., & Sheu, H. M. (2007). Erythema multiforme, StevensYJohnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis: Acute ocular manifestations, causes, and management. Cornea, 26(2), 123Y129.
Chapman, A. S., Bakken, J. S., Folk, S. M., Paddock, C. D., Bloch, K. C., Krusell, A., I CDC. (2006). Diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases: Rocky Mountain spotted fever, ehrlichioses, and anaplasmosisVUnited States: A practical guide for physicians and other health-care and public health professionals. MMWR Recommendations and Reports, 55(RR-4), 1Y27.
Chen, J., Wang, B., Zeng, Y., & Xu, H. (2010). High-dose intravenous immunoglobulins in the treatment of StevensYJohnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Chinese patients: A retrospective study of 82 cases. European Journal of Dermatology, 20(6), 743Y747.
Chiou, C. C., Yang, L. C., Hung, S. I., Chang, Y. C., Kuo, T. T., Ho, H. C., I Chung, W. H. (2008). Clinicopathological features and prognosis of drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms: A study of 30 cases in Taiwan. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 22(9), 1044Y9.
Choudhary, S., McLeod, M., Torchia, D., & Romanelli, P. (2013). Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. The Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology, 6(6), 31Y37.
Chung, W. H., Hung, S. I., Hong, H. S., Hsih, M. S., Yang, L. C., Ho, H. C., I Chen, Y. T. (2004). Medical genetics: A marker for StevensYJohnson syndrome. Nature, 428(6982), 486.
Coyle, E. A., Cha, R., & Rybak, M. J. (2003). Influences of linezolid, penicillin, and clindamycin, alone and in combination, on streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin a release. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 47(5), 1752Y1755.
Cunha, B. A. (2008). Clinical features of Rocky Mountain spotted fever. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 8(3), 143Y144.
Darenberg, J., Ihendyane, N., SjPlin, J., Aufwerber, E., Haidl, S., Follin, P., I Streptlg Study Group. (2003). Intravenous immunoglobulin G therapy in streptococcal toxic shock syndrome: A European randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 37(3), 333Y340.
Davis, J. P., Chesney, P. J., Wand, P. J., & LaVenture, M. (1980). Toxic-shock syndrome: Epidemiologic features, recurrence, risk factors, and prevention. The New England Journal of Medicine, 303(25), 1429Y1435.
Davis, J. P., Osterholm, M. T., Helms, C. M., Vergeront, J. M., Wintermeyer, L. A., Forfang, J. C., I Schell, W. L. (1982). Tri-state toxic-shock syndrome study: II. Clinical and laboratory findings. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 145(4), 441Y448.
Davis, R. E. (2000). Cultural health care or child abuse? The Southeast Asian practice of cao gio. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 12(3), 89Y95.
Ermertcan, A. T., & Ertan, P. (2010). Skin manifestations of child abuse. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, 76(4), 317Y326.
Escobar, S. J., Slade, J. B., Jr., Hunt, T. K., & Cianci, P. (2005). Adjuvant hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO2) for treatment of necrotizing fasciitis reduces mortality and amputation rate. Undersea & Hyperbaric Medicine, 32(6), 437Y443.
Eshki, M., Allanore, L., Musette, P., Milpied, B., Grange, A., Guillaume, J. C., I Descamps, V. (2009). Twelve-year analysis of severe cases of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms: A cause of unpredictable multiorgan failure. Archives of Dermatology, 145(1), 67Y72.
Eugster, R., Kissling, S., & Brand, C. U. (2001). Clinical aspects and etiology of erythroderma: An analysis of 64 cases. Praxis, 90(35), 1449Y1454.
Fast, D. J., Schlievert, P. M., & Nelson, R. D. (1989). Toxic shock syndrome-associated staphylococcal and streptococcal pyrogenic toxins are potent inducers of tumor necrosis factor production. Infection and Immunity, 57(1), 291Y294.
Ferguson, M. A., & Todd, J. K. (1990). Toxic shock syndrome associated with Staphylococcus aureus sinusitis in children. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 161(5), 953Y955.
Ferry, T., Thomas, D., Perpoint, T., Lina, G., Monneret, G., Mohammedi, I., I Etienne, J. (2008). Analysis of superantigenic toxin Vbeta T-cell signatures produced during cases of staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome and septic shock. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 14(6), 546Y554.
Granger, K., Rundell, M. S., Pingle, M. R., Shatsky, R., Larone, D. H., Golightly, L. M., I Spitzer, E. D. (2010). Multiplex PCR-ligation detection reaction assay for simultaneous detection of drug resistance and toxin genes from Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium.Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 48(1), 277Y280.
Hafermann, M. J., Barber, G. R., Dreskin, S. C., & Lindberg, G. K. (2014). Fatal case of cephalexin-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis. SAGE Open Medical Case Reports, 2.
Harr, T., & French, L. E. (2010). Toxic epidermal necrolysis and StevensYJohnson syndrome. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 5, 39.
Harr, T., & French, L. E. (2012). StevensYJohnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Chemical Immunology and Allergy, 97, 149Y166.
James, W. D., Berger, T. G., Elston, D. M., & Odom, R. B. (2006). Andrews’ diseases of the skin: Clinical dermatology (10th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier.
Javid Khojasteh, V., Rogan, M. T., Edward-Jones, V., & Foster, H. A. (2003). Detection of antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin-1 using a competitive agglutination inhibition assay. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 36(6), 372Y376.
Kano, Y., & Shiohara, T. (2004). Sequential reactivation of herpesvirus in drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 84(6), 484Y485.
Kanthraj, G. R., Srinivas, C. R., Devi, P. U., Ganasoundari, A., Shenoi, S. D., Deshmukh, R. P., I Pai, S. B. (1999). Quantitative estimation and recommendations for supplementation of protein lost through scaling in exfoliative dermatitis. International Journal of Dermatology, 38(2), 91Y95.
Kaul, R., McGreer, A., Norrby-Teglund, A., Kotb, M., Schwartz, B., O’Rourke, K., I Low, D. E. (1999). Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for streptococcal toxic shock syndromeVA comparative observational study. The Canadian Streptococcal Study Group. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 28(4), 800Y807.
Kaur, S., & Dogra, A. (2013). Toxic epidermal necrolysis due to concomitant use of lamotrigine and valproic acid. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 58(5), 406.
Kini, N., & Lazoritz, S. (1998). Evaluation for possible physical or sexual abuse. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 45(1), 205Y219.
Klontz, K. C., Lieb, S., Schreiber, M., Janowski, H. T., Baldy, L. M., & Gunn, R. A. (1988). Syndromes of Vibrio vulnificus infections. Clinical and epidemiologic features in Florida cases, 1981Y1987. Annals of Internal Medicine, 109(4), 318Y323.
Kos, L., & Shwayder, T. (2006). Cutaneous manifestations of child abuse. Pediatric Dermatology, 23(4), 311Y320.
Krenk, L., Nielsen, H. U., & Christensen, M. E. (2007). Necrotizing fasciitis in the head and neck region: An analysis of standard treatment effectiveness. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 264(8), 917Y922.
Laban, E., Hainaut-Wierzbicka, E., Pourreau, F., Yacoub, M., Sztermer, E., Guillet, G., I Bridoux, F. (2010). Cyclophosphamide therapy for corticoresistant drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome in a patient with severe kidney and eye involvement and EpsteinYBarr virus reactivation. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 55(3), e11Ye14.
Labbe´, J., & Caouette, G. (2001). Recent skin injuries in normal children. Pediatrics, 108(2), 271Y276.
Law, E. H., & Leung, M. (2015). Corticosteroids in StevensYJohnson Syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis: Current evidence and implications for future research. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 49(3), 335Y342.
Madhusudhan, T. R., Sambamurthy, S., Williams, E., & Smith, I. C. (2007). Surviving streptococcal toxic shock syndrome: A case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports, 1, 118.
Misiakos, E. P., Bagias, G., Patapis, P., Sotiropoulos, D., Kanavidis, P., & Machairas, A. (2014). Current concepts in the management of necrotizing fasciitis. Frontiers in Surgery, 1, 36.
Mittmann, N., Chan, B., Knowles, S., Cosentino, L., & Shear, N. (2006). Intravenous immunoglobulin use in patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis and StevensYJohnson syndrome. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, 7(6), 359Y368.
Mockenhaupt, M. (2014). StevensYJohnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: Clinical patterns, diagnostic considerations, etiology, and therapeutic management. Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, 33(1), 10Y16.
Mockenhaupt, M., Viboud, C., Dunant, A., Naldi, L., Halevy, S., Bouwes Bavinck, J. N., I Flahault, A. (2008). Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: Assessment of medication risks with emphasis on recently marketed drugs. The EuroSCAR-study. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 128(1), 35Y44.
Morgan, M. S. (2010). Diagnosis and management of necrotising fasciitis: A multiparametric approach. The Journal of Hospital Infection, 75(4), 249Y257.
Okoduwa, C., Lambert, W. C., Schwartz, R. A., Kubeyinje, E., Eitokpah, A., Sinha, S., & Chen, W. (2009). Erythroderma: Review of a potentially life-threatening dermatosis. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 54(1), 1Y6.
Oplatek, A., Brown, K., Sen, S., Halerz, M., Supple, K., & Gamelli, R. L. (2006). Long-term follow-up of patients treated for toxic epidermal necrolysis. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 27(1), 26Y33.
Park, K. H., Jung, S. I., Jung, Y. S., Shin, J. H., & Hwang, J. H. (2009). Marine bacteria as a leading cause of necrotizing fasciitis in coastal areas of South Korea. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 80(4), 646Y650.
Parsonnet, J., & Gillis, Z. A. (1988). Production of tumor necrosis factor by human monocytes in response to toxic-shock-syndrome toxin-1. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 158(5), 1026Y1033.
Parsonnet, J., Gillis, Z. A., & Pier, G. B. (1986). Induction of interleukin-1 by strains of Staphylococcus aureus from patients with nonmenstrual toxic shock syndrome. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 154(1), 55Y63.
Peyrie` re, H, Dereure, O., Breton, H., Demoly, P., Cociglio, M., Blayac, J. P., I Network of the French Pharmacovigilance Centers. (2006). Variability in the clinical pattern of cutaneous side-effects of drugs with systemic symptoms: Does a DRESS syndrome really exist? The British Journal of Dermatology, 155(2), 422Y428.
Ravanfar, P., & Dinulos, J. G. (2010). Cultural practices affecting the skin of children. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 22(4), 423Y431.
Reingold, A. L., Hargrett, N. T., Dan, B. B., Shands, K. N., Strickland, B. Y., & Broome, C. V. (1982). Nonmenstrual toxic shock syndrome: A review of 130 cases. Annals of Internal Medicine, 96(6 Pt. 2), 871Y874.
Reingold, A. L., Hargrett, N. T., Shands, K. N., Dan, B. B., Schmid, G. P., Strickland, B. Y., & Broome, C. V. (1982). Toxic shock syndrome surveillance in the United States, 1980 to 1981. Annals of Internal Medicine, 96(6 Pt. 2), 875Y880.
Reiss, M. A. (2000). Toxic shock syndrome. Primary Care Update for Ob/ Gyns, 7(3), 85Y90.
Revuz, J., Penso, D., Roujeau, J. C., Guillaume, J. C., Payne, C. R., Wechsler, J., & Touraine, R. (1987). Toxic epidermal necrolysis. Clinical findings and prognosis factors in 87 patients. Archives of Dermatology, 123(9), 1160Y1165.
Rothe, M. J., Bernstein, M. L., & Grant-Kels, J. M. (2005). Lifethreatening erythroderma: Diagnosing and treating the ‘‘red man’’. Clinics in Dermatology, 23(2), 206Y217.
Roujeau, J. C., Huynh, T. N., Bracq, C., Guillaume, J. C., Revuz, J., & Touraine, R. (1987). Genetic susceptibility to toxic epidermal necrolysis. Archives of Dermatology, 123(9), 1171Y1173.
Salinas, L. J., Greenfield, R. A., Little, S. E., & Voskuhl, G. W. (2010). Tickborne infections in the southern United States. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 340(3), 194Y201.
Santiago, F., Gonc¸alo, M., Vieira, R., Coelho, S., & Figueiredo, A. (2010). Epicutaneous patch testing in drug hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS). Contact Dermatitis, 62(1), 47Y53.
Schlievert, P. M. (2001). Use of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of staphylococcal and streptococcal toxic shock syndromes and related illnesses. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 108(4 Suppl.), S107YS110.
Schwartz, B., Gaventa, S., Broome, C. V., Reingold, A. L., Hightower, A. W., Perlman, J. A., & Wolf, P. H. (1989). Nonmenstrual toxic shock syndrome associated with barrier contraceptives: Report of a case-control study. Reviews of Infectious Diseases, 11(Suppl. 1), S43YS48; discussion S48YS49.
Silversides, J.A., Lappin, E., & Ferguson, A. J. (2010). Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome: Mechanisms and management. Current Infectious Disease Reports, 12(5), 392Y400.
Stella, M., Clemente, A., Bollero, D., Risso, D., & Dalmasso, P. (2007). Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and StevensYJohnson syndrome (SJS): Experience with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins and topical conservative approach. A retrospective analysis. Burns, 33(4), 452Y459.
Stratman, E., & Melski, J. (2002). Scald abuse. Archives of Dermatology, 138(3), 318Y320.
Tang, W. M., Ho, P. L., Fung, K. K., Yuen, K. Y., & Leong, J. C. (2001). Necrotising fasciitis of a limb. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 83(5), 709Y714.
Teshima, D., Ikesue, H, Itoh, Y., Urabe, K., Furue, M., & Oishi, R. (2003). Increased topical tacrolimus absorption in generalized leukemic erythroderma. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 37(10), 1444Y1447.
Todd, J., Fishaut, M., Kapral, F., & Welch, T. (1978). Toxic-shock syndrome associated with phage-group-I Staphylococci. Lancet, 2(8100), 1116Y1118.
Usatine, R., Smith, M. A., Mayeaux, E. J., Jr., Chumley, H., & Tysinger, J. (2009). The color atlas of family medicine. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Usatine, R. P., & Sandy, N. (2010). Dermatologic emergencies. American Family Physician, 82(7), 773Y780.
Valeyrie-Allanore, L., Wolkenstein, P., Brochard, L., Ortonne, N., Ma>tre, B., Revuz, J., I Roujeau, J. C. (2010). Open trial of ciclosporin treatment for StevensYJohnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. The British Journal of Dermatology, 163(4), 847Y853.
Walker, D. H., & Raoult, D. (2005). Rickettsia ricketsii and other spotted fever group rickettsiae (Rocky Mountain spotted fever and other spotted fevers). In G. L. Mandell, J. E. Bennett, & R. Dolin (Eds.), Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases (6th ed., pp. 2287Y2295). Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone.
Walsh, N. M., Prokopetz, R., Tron, V. A., Sawyer, D. M., Walters, A. K., Murray, S., & Zip, C. (1994). Histopathology in erythroderma: Review of a series of cases by multiple observers. Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, 21(5), 419Y423.
Wolff, K. J. R., & Fitzpatrick, T. B. (2005). Fitzpatrick’s color atlas and synopsis of clinical dermatology (5th ed., pp. 756Y758). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Wong, C. H., Chang, H. C., Pasupathy, S., Khin, L. W., Tan, J. L., & Low, C. O. (2003). Necrotizing fasciitis: Clinical presentation, microbiology, and determinants of mortality. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 85-A(8), 1454Y1460.
Wong, C. H., Khin, L. W., Heng, K. S., Tan, K. C., & Low, C. O. (2004). The LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) score: A tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections. Critical Care Medicine, 32(7), 1535Y1541.
Yamashita, T., Abbade, L. P., Marques, M. E., & Marques, S.A. (2012). Mycosis fungoides and Se´zary syndrome: Clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical review and update. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 87(6), 817Y828; quiz 829Y830.
Yeatman G. W., Dang V. V. (1980). Cao Gío (coin rubbing). Vietnamese attitudes toward health care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 244(24), 2748–2749.
Yeoh C., Nixon J. W., Dickson W., Kemp A., Sibert J. R. (1994). Patterns of scald injuries. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 71(2), 156–158.
Yip L. W., Thong B. Y., Lim J., Tan A. W., Wong H. B., Handa S., Heng W. J. (2007). Ocular manifestations and complications of Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: An Asian series. Allergy, 62(5), 527–531.
Yu V. L., Merigan T. C., Barriere S. (1999). Antimicrobial therapy and vaccines (p. 1460). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Zip C., Murray S., Walsh N. M. (1993). The specificity of histopathology in erythroderma. Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, 20(5), 393–398.
Zuliani E., Zwahlen H., Gilliet F., Marone C. (2005). Vancomycin-induced hypersensitivity reaction with acute renal failure: Resolution following cyclosporine treatment. Clinical Nephrology, 64(2), 155–158.
The content and information contained on this site is being provided as a convenience and for informational purposes only. The posting of sponsored content on this site should not be considered an endorsement or recommendation of the sponsor's products, services, policies, or procedures by the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP). The information and opinions expressed on this page are those of the paid sponsors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the AANP. AANP is not responsible for the content of third-party websites linked from this page; moreover, any links on this page to third-party websites where goods or services are advertised are not endorsements or recommendations by AANP of the third-party sites, goods, or services.